What brand of breaker is good? Hot topics and purchasing guides across the Internet
Recently, with the growth in demand for infrastructure projects and mining, breakers, as important accessories for excavators, have become a hot topic in the industry. This article will combine the hot content of the entire Internet in the past 10 days to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the current mainstream breaker brands for you, and provide structured data comparison to help you make a wise choice.
1. Focus on recent hot topics

According to public opinion monitoring, the following topics related to breakers are the most discussed:
| topic | heat index | Main discussion platform |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-effectiveness of domestic vs. imported breakers | 8.7/10 | Construction machinery forum, Zhihu |
| Hydraulic breaker maintenance tips | 7.9/10 | Short video platform, B station |
| New energy excavator adapted to break hammer | 6.5/10 | Industry media, WeChat public account |
2. Performance comparison of mainstream brands
The following is a comparison of the core parameters of the five brands with the highest market attention:
| Brand | Origin | Impact energy(J) | Working pressure (bar) | Average life (hours) | Price range (10,000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Copco | Sweden | 5800-12000 | 160-180 | 8000+ | 15-30 |
| Montabert | france | 5000-11000 | 150-170 | 7500+ | 12-25 |
| Soosan | South Korea | 4500-9500 | 140-160 | 6000+ | 8-18 |
| Giant | China | 4000-8500 | 130-150 | 5000+ | 5-12 |
| Furukawa | Japan | 5500-10500 | 155-175 | 7000+ | 10-22 |
3. Analysis of key factors in purchasing
According to feedback from industry experts and users, key considerations when purchasing a breaker include:
1.Matching degree of working environment: For hard materials such as granite, it is recommended to choose products with impact energy ≥8000J
2.Device compatibility: It is necessary to ensure that the breaker hammer matches the weight and hydraulic system of the excavator
3.After-sales service network: Imported brands have better service in first-tier cities, while domestic brands have wider coverage at the county level.
4.Parts supply cycle: The waiting time for special model accessories may be as long as 2 months
4. User reputation rankings
| Ranking | Brand | Satisfaction | Main advantages | Main disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Furukawa | 92% | Low failure rate and excellent fuel consumption | Price is on the high side |
| 2 | Atlas Copco | 89% | Highest crushing efficiency | High maintenance costs |
| 3 | Giant | 85% | Outstanding value for money | Average durability |
5. Industry development trends
1.Intelligent upgrade: Newly launched breakers in 2023 are generally equipped with automatic pressure adjustment systems and fault diagnosis functions
2.Material innovation: The service life of the piston using nanocomposite materials is increased by more than 30%
3.The rise of leasing model: Small and medium-sized engineering teams are more inclined to rent mid-to-high-end equipment at a price of 300-500 yuan/day.
Summary suggestions:For long-term high-intensity operations, it is recommended to choose Furukawa or Atlas Copco; for short-term projects or when the budget is limited, the domestic brand Giant is an affordable choice. Before purchasing, be sure to conduct a field test and confirm whether there is an official local repair center.
check the details
check the details